Jake's Resume: Why One LaTeX Template Took Over Tech Hiring

If you've spent any time on a resume-advice subreddit, you've seen it: a plain, single-column layout with a bold name at the top, small-caps section headings, and bullets that all start with a verb. Ask where it came from and the answer, more often than not, is one file: Jake's Resume.

That's a strange thing for a resume template to have, a fandom. Most templates are picked once and forgotten. This one gets recommended by name, in thread after thread, by people who've never met each other and have no reason to agree on anything except that this specific document works. Worth asking why.

Where it came from

Jake's Resume is a LaTeX document, originally authored by Jake Gutierrez and itself derived from an earlier template by sb2nov. It spread mainly through Overleaf, the browser-based LaTeX editor, where it's been forked and copied more times than anyone has bothered to count. The original GitHub repository is archived now, and the author's own README says the copy on it hasn't been kept current. That hasn't slowed it down. r/EngineeringResumes links to it directly from its own wiki, and someone has since converted it into a Word and .odt version specifically so people who don't know LaTeX can use it without touching a line of code.

It isn't the only template with this exact shape, either. r/EngineeringResumes maintains its own separate, wiki-endorsed template built on similar principles but with its own concrete spec: 11pt article class, XCharter font, 0.5-inch margins on all sides, no page numbers, shipped in both Letter (US) and A4 (international) variants side by side. The two templates aren't the same document, but they converge on the same idea from two different directions, which is itself evidence that this isn't one person's aesthetic preference. It's what the format actually rewards.

Why it actually works

Strip away the LaTeX and what's left is a deliberately boring layout: single column, reverse-chronological, no tables, no columns, no icons, no color blocks. That's not a lack of imagination. It's the format r/EngineeringResumes' own wiki-endorsed template converges on too, independently, with the same list of things to avoid. Plain text in a predictable structure isn't one style choice among several here; it's treated as close to the only correct one.

The detail that actually matters, and that most people copying the look of the template never notice, is one line buried in the source: `\pdfgentounicode=1`. Its only documented purpose is making sure the text in the generated PDF stays machine-readable, so a parser reads the same words a human does instead of a garbled string of ligatures and glyphs. Every visual decision in the template serves that same goal. Nothing is there for decoration.

The same discipline shows up in smaller ways once you look for it. Bolding is restricted to job titles, company names, dates, and section headers, never full sentences, so a scanning eye (human or software) can find the anchors without the page turning into a wall of bold. Bullets are kept to one or two lines; anything that spills onto a third line reads as a formatting defect to fix, not a stylistic choice. None of this is arbitrary house style. Every rule maps to something a parser or a recruiter's eight-second scan actually does with the page.

It's also, not by accident, education-first in its section ordering when adapted for students. For a new grad with more coursework and projects than work history, leading with education is the honest ordering, not a workaround, and it's a large part of why the template is so dominant specifically among students and new grads applying to engineering roles.

The two ways people actually use it

In practice this template circulates in exactly two endorsed forms: a Google Docs version, or the original LaTeX/Overleaf source. The one thing the community is emphatic about is not mixing the two: downloading the Google Doc as a .docx file and then editing it in Microsoft Word is explicitly warned against, because Word's rendering engine handles the layout differently and quietly breaks the spacing and alignment the template depends on. If you're going to use a copy of it, use it in the format it was built for, not a re-exported hybrid.

Where it falls short

None of this comes free. The template's biggest strength, LaTeX's precision, is also its biggest barrier.

• LaTeX has a real learning curve, and Overleaf, however good it is once you know LaTeX, is one more tool to learn just to edit a bullet point
• The original repository is archived, so it isn't getting maintained or updated
• Manual Word/.odt conversions floating around are unofficial, made by other people, with no guarantee they reproduce the original's formatting choices, including the machine-readability line most copies drop entirely
• Every edit still has to be done by hand: there's no scoring, no tailoring per job description, and no way to know if your bullets are actually strong until a human reads them

Jake's layout, no LaTeX required

SupaCV ships Jake's layout as one of two genuinely free templates: same visual identity, same single-column, education-first, ATS-safe structure, with no LaTeX, no Overleaf account, and no manually-copied file of uncertain provenance to track down. You edit it the same way you'd edit any resume in the builder: inline, field by field, with an ATS score updating as you go.

That's also where the free tier stops being just a nicer editor for the same static document. Every resume built on this template gets scored on the same six dimensions as every other template (keywords, formatting, completeness, quantification, readability, and language quality), can be tailored per Target Role instead of hand-edited for every application, and exports as a real PDF, forever, with no trial and no card required. The template got you the interview-worthy shape. The rest of the job is making sure the words inside it hold up too.